请输入关键字
请输入关键字
订购
*国家
中国
美国
中国香港
中国澳门
中国台湾
阿尔巴尼亚
阿尔及利亚
阿根廷
阿拉伯联合酋长国
阿鲁巴
阿曼
阿塞拜疆
阿森松岛
埃及
埃塞俄比亚
爱尔兰
爱沙尼亚
安道尔
安哥拉
安圭拉
安提瓜和巴布达
奥地利
奥兰群岛
澳大利亚
巴巴多斯
巴布亚新几内亚
巴哈马
巴基斯坦
巴拉圭
巴勒斯坦领土
巴林
巴拿马
巴西
白俄罗斯
百慕大
保加利亚
北马里亚纳群岛
贝宁
比利时
冰岛
波多黎各
波兰
波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那
玻利维亚
伯利兹
博茨瓦纳
不丹
布基纳法索
布隆迪
朝鲜
赤道几内亚
丹麦
德国
迪戈加西亚岛
东帝汶
多哥
多米尼加共和国
多米尼克
俄罗斯
厄瓜多尔
厄立特里亚
法国
法罗群岛
法属波利尼西亚
法属圭亚那
法属南部领地
梵蒂冈
菲律宾
斐济
芬兰
佛得角
福克兰群岛
冈比亚
刚果(布)
刚果(金)
哥伦比亚
哥斯达黎加
格恩西岛
格林纳达
格陵兰
格鲁吉亚
古巴
瓜德罗普
关岛
圭亚那
哈萨克斯坦
海地
韩国
荷兰
荷属加勒比区
荷属圣马丁
黑山
洪都拉斯
基里巴斯
吉布提
吉尔吉斯斯坦
几内亚
几内亚比绍
加拿大
加纳
加纳利群岛
加蓬
柬埔寨
捷克
津巴布韦
喀麦隆
卡塔尔
开曼群岛
科科斯(基林)群岛
科摩罗
科索沃
科特迪瓦
科威特
克罗地亚
肯尼亚
库克群岛
库拉索
拉脱维亚
莱索托
老挝
黎巴嫩
立陶宛
利比里亚
利比亚
联合国
列支敦士登
留尼汪
卢森堡
卢旺达
罗马尼亚
马达加斯加
马恩岛
马尔代夫
马耳他
马拉维
马来西亚
马里
马其顿
马绍尔群岛
马提尼克
马约特
毛里求斯
毛里塔尼亚
美国本土外小岛屿
美属萨摩亚
美属维尔京群岛
蒙古
蒙特塞拉特
孟加拉国
秘鲁
密克罗尼西亚
缅甸
摩尔多瓦
摩洛哥
摩纳哥
莫桑比克
墨西哥
纳米比亚
南非
南极洲
南乔治亚和南桑威奇群岛
南苏丹
瑙鲁
尼加拉瓜
尼泊尔
尼日尔
尼日利亚
纽埃
挪威
诺福克岛
帕劳
皮特凯恩群岛
葡萄牙
日本
瑞典
瑞士
萨尔瓦多
萨摩亚
塞尔维亚
塞拉利昂
塞内加尔
塞浦路斯
塞舌尔
沙特阿拉伯
圣巴泰勒米
圣诞岛
圣多美和普林西比
圣赫勒拿
圣基茨和尼维斯
圣卢西亚
圣马丁岛
圣马力诺
圣皮埃尔和密克隆群岛
圣文森特和格林纳丁斯
斯里兰卡
斯洛伐克
斯洛文尼亚
斯瓦尔巴和扬马延
斯威士兰
苏丹
苏里南
所罗门群岛
索马里
塔吉克斯坦
泰国
坦桑尼亚
汤加
特克斯和凯科斯群岛
特里斯坦-达库尼亚群岛
特立尼达和多巴哥
突尼斯
图瓦卢
土耳其
土库曼斯坦
托克劳
瓦利斯和富图纳
瓦努阿图
危地马拉
委内瑞拉
文莱
乌干达
乌克兰
乌拉圭
乌兹别克斯坦
希腊
西班牙
西撒哈拉
新加坡
新喀里多尼亚
新西兰
匈牙利
休达及梅利利亚
叙利亚
牙买加
亚美尼亚
也门
伊拉克
伊朗
以色列
意大利
印度
印度尼西亚
英国
英属维尔京群岛
英属印度洋领地
约旦
越南
赞比亚
泽西岛
乍得
直布罗陀
智利
中非共和国
*省份
*城市
*姓名
*电话
*单位
*职位
*邮箱
*请输入验证码
*验证码
B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice
Strain Name C57BL/6N-Tg(RP11-634C1)1(CH17-401N15)1/Bcgen Common Name   B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice 
Background C57BL/6N Catalog number  112332
Related Genes 
LILRB2: ILT4, LIR2, CD85D, ILT-4, LIR-2, MIR10, MIR-10
LILRB3: HL9, ILT5, LIR3, PIRB, CD85A, ILT-5, LIR-3, PIR-B, LILRA6
LILRB1: ILT2, LIR1, MIR7, PIRB, CD85J, ILT-2, LIR-1, MIR-7, PIR-B
LILRB4: ILT3, LIR5, CD85K, ILT-3, LIR-5
LILRB1 expression analysis in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (non-tumor bearing)

Protein expression analysis

from clipboard


Strain specific hLILRB1 expression analysis in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice by flow cytometry. Blood were collected from wild-type (+/+) and transgenic B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (Tg), and analyzed by flow cytometry with species-specific anti-human LILRB1 antibody. Human LILRB1 was both detectable in T cells, B cells, NK cells and granulocytes from B-Tg(hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice but not wild-type mice.

from clipboard


Strain specific hLILRB1 expression analysis in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice by flow cytometry. Blood were collected from wild-type (+/+) and transgenic B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (Tg), and analyzed by flow cytometry with species-specific anti-human LILRB1 antibody. Human LILRB1 was both detectable in monocytes and macrophages from B-Tg(hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice but not wild-type mice.

LILRB2 expression analysis in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (non-tumor bearing)

Protein expression analysis


from clipboard


Strain specific hLILRB2 expression analysis in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice by flow cytometry. Blood were collected from wild-type (+/+) and transgenic B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (Tg), and analyzed by flow cytometry with species-specific anti-human LILRB2 antibody. Human LILRB2 was both detectable in T cells, B cells, NK cells and granulocytes from B-Tg(hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice but not wild-type mice.

from clipboard


Strain specific hLILRB2 expression analysis in  B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice by flow cytometry. Blood were collected from wild-type (+/+) and transgenic B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (Tg), and analyzed by flow cytometry with species-specific anti-human LILRB2 antibody. Human LILRB2 was both detectable in monocytes and macrophages from B-Tg(hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice but not wild-type mice.


LILRB3 expression analysis in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (non-tumor bearing)

Protein expression analysis


from clipboard

from clipboard

LILRB4 expression analysis in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (non-tumor bearing)



Protein expression analysis

from clipboard

from clipboard

Analysis of leukocytes cell subpopulation in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4) mice (non-tumor bearing)



Analysis of leukocytes cell subpopulation in spleen

from clipboard


Analysis of spleen leukocyte subpopulations by FACS. Splenocytes were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice (n=3, 8-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the splenocytes was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live cells were gated for the CD45+ population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, granulocytes, monocytes and macrophages in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that LILRB1, LILRB2, LILRB3 and LILRB4 humanized does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these cell types in spleen. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of T cell subpopulation in spleen

from clipboard


Analysis of spleen T cell subpopulations by FACS. Splenocytes were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice (n=3, 8-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the splenocytes was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live CD45+ cells were gated for TCRβ+ T cell population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. The percent of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and Tregs in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of LILRB1, LILRB2, LILRB3 and LILRB4 does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these T cell subtypes in spleen. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of leukocytes cell subpopulation in LNs

from clipboard




Analysis of thymus leukocyte subpopulations by FACS. LNs (Lymph nodes) were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice (n=3, 8-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the LNs was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live cells were gated for the CD45+ population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of T cells, B cells and NK cells in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that LILRB1, LILRB2, LILRB3 and LILRB4 humanized does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these cell types in LNs. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of T cell subpopulation in LNs

from clipboard


Analysis of thymus T cell subpopulations by FACS. LNs (Lymph nodes) were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice (n=3, 8-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the LNs was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live CD45+ cells were gated for TCRβ+ T cell population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. The percent of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and Tregs in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of LILRB1, LILRB2, LILRB3 and LILRB4 does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these T cell subtypes in LNs. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of leukocytes cell subpopulation in blood

from clipboard


Analysis of blood leukocyte subpopulations by FACS. Blood leukocytes were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice (n=3, 8-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the blood leukocytes were performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live cells were gated for the CD45+ population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, granulocytes, monocytes and macrophages in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that LILRB1, LILRB2, LILRB3 and LILRB4 humanized does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these cell types in blood. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of T cell subpopulation in blood

from clipboard


Analysis of blood T cell subpopulations by FACS. Blood leukocytes were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice (n=3, 8-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the blood leukocytes were performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live CD45+ cells were gated for TCRβ+ T cell population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. The percent of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and Tregs in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of LILRB1, LILRB2, LILRB3 and LILRB4 does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these T cell subtypes in blood. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of leukocytes cell subpopulation in BM

from clipboard


Analysis of bone marrow leukocyte subpopulations by FACS. Bone marrow leukocyte were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice (n=3, 8-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the bone marrow leukocyte was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live cells were gated for the CD45+ population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, granulocytes, monocytes and macrophages in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that LILRB1, LILRB2, LILRB3 and LILRB4 humanized does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these cell types in bone marrow. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of T cell subpopulation in BM

from clipboard


Analysis of bone marrow T cell subpopulations by FACS. Bone marrow leukocyte were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice (n=3, 8-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the bone marrow leukocyte was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live CD45+ cells were gated for TCRβ+ T cell population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. The percent of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and Tregs in B-Tg(hLILRB2/hLILRB3/hLILRB1/hLILRB4)mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of LILRB1, LILRB2, LILRB3 and LILRB4 does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these T cell subtypes in bone marrow. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.